[Biojava-dev] javadocs for 3.0

[Michael Heuer]

Ah, right, I had forgotten about those.  External dependencies not on
Maven Central are kind of a deal-breaker (and a catch-22 in many cases).
There are some workarounds (e.g. repackage under a biojava groupId) but
they all smell bad.

   michael


On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Andreas Prlic wrote:

> Good suggestion. I will update our poms accordingly.  Some of the
> modules have a dependency now on some external projects that don't
> have a Maven build yet (e.g. Jmol) Do we need to cover those external
> projects as well? Since everything is LGPL it is probably no problem
> to provide such a build. Is this common practise?
>
> Andreas
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Michael Heuer <heuermh at acm.org> wrote:
> > Andreas Prlic wrote:
> >
> >> The javadocs for 3.0 are now available from:
> >> http://www.biojava.org/docs/api_latest/index.html
> >>
> >> In terms of java code we are release ready, but I think we still need
> >> to improve the documentation (both javadocs and on wiki) before
> >> declaring the release. As you can see there are still a lot of
> >> packages and classes without javadoc... Help needed!
> >
> > Is there a plan in place for getting the 3.0 release artifacts mirrored to
> > Maven Central?  There might be some POM tweaking and PGP stuff necessary
> > for that, see
> >
> > https://docs.sonatype.org/display/Repository/Central+Sync+Requirements
> >
> >   michael
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dr. Andreas Prlic
> Senior Scientist, RCSB PDB Protein Data Bank
> University of California, San Diego
> (+1) 858.246.0526
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>