[Biojava-dev] proposal to drop BioSQL Singapore version support from BJ version 1.6 onwards

[Andy Yates]

+1

Maintaining two apis is always a bad idea

On 6 Mar 2008, at 06:24, Mark Schreiber wrote:

> Hi all -
>
> With the formal release of BioSQL v1.0 (Tokyo) and the new Hibernate
> ORM mapping to BioSQL offered in BioJava 1.5 (BioJavaX) the older JDBC
> mappings to the BioSQL (Singapore) are now outdated.  We have not been
> supporting these for some time.
>
> Unless people are still actively using these mappings I would propose
> that we drop them from the upcoming BioJava 1.6.  This would remove
> some cruft from the code base and would also mean we can drop about 4
> jar files from the lib (commons-pool etc).
>
> Are there any strong arguments for or against?
>
> - Mark
> _______________________________________________
> biojava-dev mailing list
> biojava-dev at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-dev