[Biojava-dev] Lazy BioSQL ontology loading?
Len Trigg
len at reeltwo.com
Tue Feb 17 14:29:03 EST 2004
Hi guys,
A while ago when the ontology stuff had those major updates I remember
having to go through a procedure to migrate my existing biosql databases
to comply with the new ontology handling.
A few days ago when I tried out the current biojava code on my
databases, it died with the following complaint about a particular
ontology term not being present in the database. I presume this may be
because something changed in the grammar and that I need to repeat the
ontology import procedure?
Exception in thread "main" java.util.NoSuchElementException: No term
named 'and(_r:89(_x:89, _y:89), _r:89(_y:89, _z:89))'
at org.biojava.ontology.Ontology$Impl.getTerm(Ontology.java:275)
at
org.biojava.bio.seq.db.biosql.OntologySQL.blessExternal(OntologySQL.java:321)
at
org.biojava.bio.seq.db.biosql.OntologySQL.loadTerms(OntologySQL.java:314)
at
org.biojava.bio.seq.db.biosql.OntologySQL.<init>(OntologySQL.java:360)
at
org.biojava.bio.seq.db.biosql.BioSQLSequenceDB.initDb(BioSQLSequenceDB.java:235)
at
org.biojava.bio.seq.db.biosql.BioSQLSequenceDB.<init>(BioSQLSequenceDB.java:164)
Loading this ontology is actually relatively time consuming, and since
my current applications don't even use ontologies (well, other than
__biojava_guano), I was thinking about making the ontology loading lazy.
This would reduce the startup time of my apps as well as providing some
protection against grammar changes. Does anyone have any thoughts about
potential pitfalls?
Cheers,
Len
More information about the biojava-dev
mailing list