From staff@absolutefrsmt.com Sun Dec 1 02:26:44 2002 From: staff@absolutefrsmt.com (sloan) Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 21:26:44 -0500 (EST) Subject: [Biojava-dev] FREE LIVE SEX CAMS Message-ID: <20021201022644.676DD5501D@mx.emailhowdy.com> TIFFANY 22 - SWF seeking a fun, sensitive guy for a discreet relationship. This relationship would include friendship and a long term "on the side" Sex Partner. I really miss intimacy from a man and get none at home. Discretion is of the utmost importance! Married men are fine - click here to see my pictures http://redir.impulsive.com/redir.php?id=2583&u=475900655&b=5480 This Email Brought To You By Absolute Free Smut & Carla's Corner
We appreciate your patronage, and thank you for opting in To cancel your subscription to this newsletter, click here.
From drusch@tcag.org Mon Dec 2 20:47:59 2002 From: drusch@tcag.org (Doug Rusch) Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 15:47:59 -0500 Subject: [Biojava-dev] blast parsing slowness Message-ID: <9A1D3672623FE64DA00A67D12BC679988BCA9A@exchange2.vfirm.com> This is a good topic for consideration with BioJava2. The circumstances are this: I have my blast parser working in my personal experimental biojava package. The blast data I am parsing was generated by blasting 1 mb human genomic chunks against small sequences (basically ests), so 1 query many different subjects. Anyways, I did comparisons of the java code against a home brewed perl blast parser. The biojava was much slower (at least an order of magnatitude slower) than the perl code. Now this isnt quite a fair test because the design of the two parsers is completely different but if anything I would still expect Java to be faster than perl. I profiled the code and found that the vast majority of the processing time was being spent in org.biojava.utils.ChangeSupport.growIfNecessary. Everytime it creates an alignment (org.biojava.bio.program.ssbind.BlastLikeSearchBuilder.makeSubHit) it is adding a changeListener to the generic alphabet (org.biojava.bio.symbol.SimpleSymbolList.addListener) it is using for alignments. Obviously it is adding many thousands of change listeners to the alphabet, but to add insult to injury, the listeners are all ALWAYS_VETO. So this poor alphabet has thousands of listeners telling it not to change. Is this really what was intended? I get the impression that the ALWAYS_VETO changeListener is a special case. Perhaps ALWAYS_VETO listeners should just be kept track of by a counter? Should alphabets be changable at all? I do not know what use cases prompted this design but is there any concensus on a fix? Doug Rusch drusch@tcag.org From heuermh@acm.org Mon Dec 2 20:56:36 2002 From: heuermh@acm.org (Michael L. Heuer) Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 15:56:36 -0500 (EST) Subject: [Biojava-dev] blast parsing slowness In-Reply-To: <9A1D3672623FE64DA00A67D12BC679988BCA9A@exchange2.vfirm.com> Message-ID: sounds like a bug to me. At a minimum those ALWAYS_VETO listeners should be optimized away. I'm of the opinion that it would be better to have truely immutable implementations of the interfaces in addition to the mutable ones with ChangeEvent support than the current design. What do others think? michael On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Doug Rusch wrote: > This is a good topic for consideration with BioJava2. > > The circumstances are this: I have my blast parser working in my personal experimental biojava package. The blast data I am parsing was generated by blasting 1 mb human genomic chunks against small sequences (basically ests), so 1 query many different subjects. Anyways, I did comparisons of the java code against a home brewed perl blast parser. The biojava was much slower (at least an order of magnatitude slower) than the perl code. Now this isnt quite a fair test because the design of the two parsers is completely different but if anything I would still expect Java to be faster than perl. > > I profiled the code and found that the vast majority of the processing time was being spent in org.biojava.utils.ChangeSupport.growIfNecessary. Everytime it creates an alignment (org.biojava.bio.program.ssbind.BlastLikeSearchBuilder.makeSubHit) it is adding a changeListener to the generic alphabet (org.biojava.bio.symbol.SimpleSymbolList.addListener) it is using for alignments. Obviously it is adding many thousands of change listeners to the alphabet, but to add insult to injury, the listeners are all ALWAYS_VETO. So this poor alphabet has thousands of listeners telling it not to change. > > Is this really what was intended? I get the impression that the ALWAYS_VETO changeListener is a special case. Perhaps ALWAYS_VETO listeners should just be kept track of by a counter? Should alphabets be changable at all? I do not know what use cases prompted this design but is there any concensus on a fix? > > Doug Rusch > drusch@tcag.org > > > > > _______________________________________________ > biojava-dev mailing list > biojava-dev@biojava.org > http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-dev > From mark.schreiber@agresearch.co.nz Mon Dec 2 20:57:17 2002 From: mark.schreiber@agresearch.co.nz (Schreiber, Mark) Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 09:57:17 +1300 Subject: [Biojava-dev] blast parsing slowness Message-ID: Hmm, me thinks there should only be one listener. I think this should be fixed before BJ1.3. Following your description I wasn't able to find the exact point where all these listeners get added. Could you give me a line number or something? Profiling of the common methods in general could be a good thing before BJ1.3 and BJ2. It has helped spot things that work but do unneeded stuff. - Mark > -----Original Message----- > From: Doug Rusch [mailto:drusch@tcag.org] > Sent: Tuesday, 3 December 2002 9:48 a.m. > To: biojava-dev@biojava.org > Subject: RE: [Biojava-dev] blast parsing slowness > > > This is a good topic for consideration with BioJava2. > > The circumstances are this: I have my blast parser working in > my personal experimental biojava package. The blast data I am > parsing was generated by blasting 1 mb human genomic chunks > against small sequences (basically ests), so 1 query many > different subjects. Anyways, I did comparisons of the java > code against a home brewed perl blast parser. The biojava was > much slower (at least an order of magnatitude slower) than > the perl code. Now this isnt quite a fair test because the > design of the two parsers is completely different but if > anything I would still expect Java to be faster than perl. > > I profiled the code and found that the vast majority of the > processing time was being spent in > org.biojava.utils.ChangeSupport.growIfNecessary. Everytime it > creates an alignment > (org.biojava.bio.program.ssbind.BlastLikeSearchBuilder.makeSub > Hit) it is adding a changeListener to the generic alphabet > (org.biojava.bio.symbol.SimpleSymbolList.addListener) it is > using for alignments. Obviously it is adding many thousands > of change listeners to the alphabet, but to add insult to > injury, the listeners are all ALWAYS_VETO. So this poor > alphabet has thousands of listeners telling it not to change. > > Is this really what was intended? I get the impression that > the ALWAYS_VETO changeListener is a special case. Perhaps > ALWAYS_VETO listeners should just be kept track of by a > counter? Should alphabets be changable at all? I do not know > what use cases prompted this design but is there any > concensus on a fix? > > Doug Rusch > drusch@tcag.org > > > > > _______________________________________________ > biojava-dev mailing list > biojava-dev@biojava.org > http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-dev > ======================================================================= Attention: The information contained in this message and/or attachments from AgResearch Limited is intended only for the persons or entities to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipients is prohibited by AgResearch Limited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately. ======================================================================= From matthew_pocock@yahoo.co.uk Mon Dec 2 21:21:20 2002 From: matthew_pocock@yahoo.co.uk (Matthew Pocock) Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2002 21:21:20 +0000 Subject: [Biojava-dev] blast parsing slowness In-Reply-To: <9A1D3672623FE64DA00A67D12BC679988BCA9A@exchange2.vfirm.com> References: <9A1D3672623FE64DA00A67D12BC679988BCA9A@exchange2.vfirm.com> Message-ID: <3DEBCED0.1010009@yahoo.co.uk> This is a bonefidey bug. Could you send me the app & I will fix it. Matthew Doug Rusch wrote: > This is a good topic for consideration with BioJava2. > > The circumstances are this: I have my blast parser working in my personal experimental biojava package. The blast data I am parsing was generated by blasting 1 mb human genomic chunks against small sequences (basically ests), so 1 query many different subjects. Anyways, I did comparisons of the java code against a home brewed perl blast parser. The biojava was much slower (at least an order of magnatitude slower) than the perl code. Now this isnt quite a fair test because the design of the two parsers is completely different but if anything I would still expect Java to be faster than perl. > > I profiled the code and found that the vast majority of the processing time was being spent in org.biojava.utils.ChangeSupport.growIfNecessary. Everytime it creates an alignment (org.biojava.bio.program.ssbind.BlastLikeSearchBuilder.makeSubHit) it is adding a changeListener to the generic alphabet (org.biojava.bio.symbol.SimpleSymbolList.addListener) it is using for alignments. Obviously it is adding many thousands of change listeners to the alphabet, but to add insult to injury, the listeners are all ALWAYS_VETO. So this poor alphabet has thousands of listeners telling it not to change. > > Is this really what was intended? I get the impression that the ALWAYS_VETO changeListener is a special case. Perhaps ALWAYS_VETO listeners should just be kept track of by a counter? Should alphabets be changable at all? I do not know what use cases prompted this design but is there any concensus on a fix? > > Doug Rusch > drusch@tcag.org > > > > > _______________________________________________ > biojava-dev mailing list > biojava-dev@biojava.org > http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-dev > -- BioJava Consulting LTD - Support and training for BioJava http://www.biojava.co.uk __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com From contests4us@lists.opt4email.com Mon Dec 2 23:22:21 2002 From: contests4us@lists.opt4email.com (Contests4Us Newsletter) Date: Dec 02 2002 23:22:21 Subject: [Biojava-dev] Help Wanted - Excellent Pay! Message-ID: <200212030937.gB39bUa2019042@pw600a.bioperl.org> <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> Contests4Us.com Newsletter - Make Cash! <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> Part-time help wanted: Motivated individuals ONLY. Work from home and earn up to $175 an hour!! Make more than you do at your day job! Click Here to Learn How: http://r1.opt4email.com/?u=130&l=11&id=1213371 AOL Users Click Here Thanks, Contests4Us.com http://www.Contests4Us.com . You have received this email because you visited our partner or site and commenced registration to receive our newsletter. If you have received this email in error or would like to unsubscribe, please follow the instructions below. <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> * To be removed from this mailing list, click here: http://www.opt4email.com/u/?l=contests4us&e=biojava-dev@biojava.org AOL users click here to unsubscribe OR... * Reply to this email with the word "remove" as the subject. This message was sent to: biojava-dev@biojava.org X-Opt4email-Recipient: biojava-dev@biojava.org X-Opt4email-Userid: contests4us <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> From matthew_pocock@yahoo.co.uk Tue Dec 3 14:37:16 2002 From: matthew_pocock@yahoo.co.uk (=?iso-8859-1?q?Matthew=20Pocock?=) Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 14:37:16 +0000 (GMT) Subject: [Biojava-dev] sequence DB mess Message-ID: <20021203143716.18763.qmail@web14912.mail.yahoo.com> Hi, We have NCBISequenceDB, WebSequenceDB, {Genbank, Genpept, Swissprot}SequenceDB all doing similar or overlapping things. Could we rationalize pre release? I'm unsure which of these work, or are used. Any ideas? Matthew __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com From mark.schreiber@agresearch.co.nz Tue Dec 3 20:38:41 2002 From: mark.schreiber@agresearch.co.nz (Schreiber, Mark) Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 09:38:41 +1300 Subject: [Biojava-dev] sequence DB mess Message-ID: I recently made WebSequenceDB and NCBISequenceDB to work. The fact that it didn't previously probably means no one was using it. I agree that some rationalisation would be v. good. The problem is exasperated by diverse services. For example you can access lots of NCBI services through URLs, you can also do it through the Qblast service (which does entrez stuff as well). Qblast is potentially much more powerful than the URL service and Qblast can also be set up in house. Is there a nice model from bioperl we can steal? Might this be a case for webservices? - Mark > -----Original Message----- > From: Matthew Pocock [mailto:matthew_pocock@yahoo.co.uk] > Sent: Wednesday, 4 December 2002 3:37 a.m. > To: biojava-dev@biojava.org > Subject: [Biojava-dev] sequence DB mess > > > Hi, > > We have NCBISequenceDB, WebSequenceDB, {Genbank, > Genpept, Swissprot}SequenceDB all doing similar or > overlapping things. Could we rationalize pre release? > > I'm unsure which of these work, or are used. Any > ideas? > > Matthew > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Everything you'll ever need on one web page > from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts > http://uk.my.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > biojava-dev mailing list > biojava-dev@biojava.org > http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-dev > ======================================================================= Attention: The information contained in this message and/or attachments from AgResearch Limited is intended only for the persons or entities to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipients is prohibited by AgResearch Limited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately. ======================================================================= From staff@absolutefrsmt.com Tue Dec 3 20:47:14 2002 From: staff@absolutefrsmt.com (boswell) Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 15:47:14 -0500 (EST) Subject: [Biojava-dev] Teen Fisting Message-ID: <20021203204714.0E8A499F8E@mx.emailhowdy.com> !!!EXTREME TIMES!!! Newsletter #176 The results are in for the !!!Extreme Times!!! Site of the month as voted by you our loyal readers. November's winner is a brand new site that wasn't launched until late October and it still ran away with the contest. With a grand total of 364,871 votes (78%) the winner is http://redir.impulsive.com/redir.php?id=2665&u=475900655&b=5499 This is the first site in a long time to appeal to what we truly love. 1) extreme sexual acts - nothing pushes a pussy or ass to the extreme like some good hardcore fisting 2) young girls - does it get any better then someone who is so sweet and innocent looking looks like they are going through the most painful and at the same time most enjoyable experience of their life 3) price - shouldn't everything on the internet be free? http://redir.impulsive.com/redir.php?id=2665&u=475900655&b=5499 It's easy to see why this site won your hearts. It has everything we love. Suddenly it looks like we have a new favorite for site of the year. To the owner of this site, you should now that your work is really appreciated. We raise our fist to you. http://redir.impulsive.com/redir.php?id=2665&u=475900655&b=5499 This Email brought to you by absolute free smut & carla's corner!
We appreciate your patronage, and thank you for opting in To cancel your subscription to this newsletter, click here.
From matthew_pocock@yahoo.co.uk Wed Dec 4 23:17:54 2002 From: matthew_pocock@yahoo.co.uk (Matthew Pocock) Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 23:17:54 +0000 Subject: [Biojava-dev] blast parsing slowness In-Reply-To: <9A1D3672623FE64DA00A67D12BC679988BCA9A@exchange2.vfirm.com> References: <9A1D3672623FE64DA00A67D12BC679988BCA9A@exchange2.vfirm.com> Message-ID: <3DEE8D22.8050009@yahoo.co.uk> Doug, Could you try again now? Thomas has committed a fix to the event meta-data. We'd kind of mucked some of the plumbing up. Matthew Doug Rusch wrote: > This is a good topic for consideration with BioJava2. > > The circumstances are this: I have my blast parser working in my personal experimental biojava package. The blast data I am parsing was generated by blasting 1 mb human genomic chunks against small sequences (basically ests), so 1 query many different subjects. Anyways, I did comparisons of the java code against a home brewed perl blast parser. The biojava was much slower (at least an order of magnatitude slower) than the perl code. Now this isnt quite a fair test because the design of the two parsers is completely different but if anything I would still expect Java to be faster than perl. > > I profiled the code and found that the vast majority of the processing time was being spent in org.biojava.utils.ChangeSupport.growIfNecessary. Everytime it creates an alignment (org.biojava.bio.program.ssbind.BlastLikeSearchBuilder.makeSubHit) it is adding a changeListener to the generic alphabet (org.biojava.bio.symbol.SimpleSymbolList.addListener) it is using for alignments. Obviously it is adding many thousands of change listeners to the alphabet, but to add insult to injury, the listeners are all ALWAYS_VETO. So this poor alphabet has thousands of listeners telling it not to change. > > Is this really what was intended? I get the impression that the ALWAYS_VETO changeListener is a special case. Perhaps ALWAYS_VETO listeners should just be kept track of by a counter? Should alphabets be changable at all? I do not know what use cases prompted this design but is there any concensus on a fix? > > Doug Rusch > drusch@tcag.org > > > > > _______________________________________________ > biojava-dev mailing list > biojava-dev@biojava.org > http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-dev > -- BioJava Consulting LTD - Support and training for BioJava http://www.biojava.co.uk __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com From contests4us@lists.opt4email.com Thu Dec 5 12:27:35 2002 From: contests4us@lists.opt4email.com (Contests4Us Newsletter) Date: Dec 05 2002 12:27:35 Subject: [Biojava-dev] Your Free PCS Cell Phone is Ready to Ship Message-ID: <200212060004.gB604AJ8029435@pw600a.bioperl.org> <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> Contests4Us.com Newsletter - Cell Phones! <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> Get a FREE PCS Cell Phone at no cost with up to 2500 anytime minutes per month. No Deposit required. Premium Kyrocera , Motorola, and LG Phones, Free Shipping, and Long Distance! Sign up today!!! http://r1.opt4email.com/?u=135&l=11&id=1213371 AOL Users Click Here *Must be over 18 and approved for credit by carrier to qualify for free phone. Thanks, Contests4Us.com http://www.Contests4Us.com . You have received this email because you visited our partner or site and commenced registration to receive our newsletter. If you have received this email in error or would like to unsubscribe, please follow the instructions below. <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> * To be removed from this mailing list, click here: http://www.opt4email.com/u/?l=contests4us&e=biojava-dev@biojava.org AOL users click here to unsubscribe OR... * Reply to this email with the word "remove" as the subject. This message was sent to: biojava-dev@biojava.org X-Opt4email-Recipient: biojava-dev@biojava.org X-Opt4email-Userid: contests4us <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> From drusch@tcag.org Fri Dec 6 21:20:38 2002 From: drusch@tcag.org (Doug Rusch) Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 16:20:38 -0500 Subject: [Biojava-dev] blast parsing slowness Message-ID: <9A1D3672623FE64DA00A67D12BC679988BCAC4@exchange2.vfirm.com> So I have tested the fix and it seems good. Now the parsing is much faster and most of the time is spent handling the regex's. Thanks alot! Doug -----Original Message----- From: Matthew Pocock [mailto:matthew_pocock@yahoo.co.uk] Sent: Wed 12/4/02 6:17 PM To: Doug Rusch Cc: biojava-dev@biojava.org Subject: Re: [Biojava-dev] blast parsing slowness Doug, Could you try again now? Thomas has committed a fix to the event meta-data. We'd kind of mucked some of the plumbing up. Matthew Doug Rusch wrote: > This is a good topic for consideration with BioJava2. > > The circumstances are this: I have my blast parser working in my personal experimental biojava package. The blast data I am parsing was generated by blasting 1 mb human genomic chunks against small sequences (basically ests), so 1 query many different subjects. Anyways, I did comparisons of the java code against a home brewed perl blast parser. The biojava was much slower (at least an order of magnatitude slower) than the perl code. Now this isnt quite a fair test because the design of the two parsers is completely different but if anything I would still expect Java to be faster than perl. > > I profiled the code and found that the vast majority of the processing time was being spent in org.biojava.utils.ChangeSupport.growIfNecessary. Everytime it creates an alignment (org.biojava.bio.program.ssbind.BlastLikeSearchBuilder.makeSubHit) it is adding a changeListener to the generic alphabet (org.biojava.bio.symbol.SimpleSymbolList.addListener) it is using for alignments. Obviously it is adding many thousands of change listeners to the alphabet, but to add insult to injury, the listeners are all ALWAYS_VETO. So this poor alphabet has thousands of listeners telling it not to change. > > Is this really what was intended? I get the impression that the ALWAYS_VETO changeListener is a special case. Perhaps ALWAYS_VETO listeners should just be kept track of by a counter? Should alphabets be changable at all? I do not know what use cases prompted this design but is there any concensus on a fix? > > Doug Rusch > drusch@tcag.org > > > > > _______________________________________________ > biojava-dev mailing list > biojava-dev@biojava.org > http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-dev > -- BioJava Consulting LTD - Support and training for BioJava http://www.biojava.co.uk __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com From mark.schreiber@agresearch.co.nz Sun Dec 8 22:59:01 2002 From: mark.schreiber@agresearch.co.nz (Schreiber, Mark) Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 11:59:01 +1300 Subject: [Biojava-dev] Suggestion for Canonical Symbols Message-ID: Hi - If you translate and RNA SymbolList into Protein the Symbols in the protein SymbolList come from the alphabet referenced by the ProteinTools.getTAlphabet. The Symbols from the Talphabet are not canonical with the Symbols from the other protein Alphabet. This has lead to some very surprising bugs in some stuff we were developing. Given that Integer Symbols are now canonical even if they come from IntegerAlphabet or one of the Integer.SubAlphabets could the same happen for the protein Alphabets? Thanks Mark Mark Schreiber PhD Bioinformatics AgResearch Invermay PO Box 50034 Mosgiel New Zealand PH: +64 3 489 9175 FAX: +64 3 489 3739 ======================================================================= Attention: The information contained in this message and/or attachments from AgResearch Limited is intended only for the persons or entities to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipients is prohibited by AgResearch Limited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately. ======================================================================= From td2@sanger.ac.uk Mon Dec 9 00:00:20 2002 From: td2@sanger.ac.uk (Thomas Down) Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 00:00:20 +0000 Subject: [Biojava-dev] Suggestion for Canonical Symbols In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20021209000020.GB162243@jabba.sanger.ac.uk> On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 11:59:01AM +1300, Schreiber, Mark wrote: > Hi - > > If you translate and RNA SymbolList into Protein the Symbols in the > protein SymbolList come from the alphabet referenced by the > ProteinTools.getTAlphabet. > > The Symbols from the Talphabet are not canonical with the Symbols from > the other protein Alphabet. This has lead to some very surprising bugs > in some stuff we were developing. Given that Integer Symbols are now > canonical even if they come from IntegerAlphabet or one of the > Integer.SubAlphabets could the same happen for the protein Alphabets? *sigh* That was actually the original behaviour. I broke it (deliberately) a few weeks ago when fixing the knotty question of serializing ambiguous symbols, so now you know who to blame. At the time, requiring that all well-known symbols should be scoped by Alphabet provided a sane way of cleaning up the serialization code without having to write totally new Symbol and Alphabet implementations for all the well-known cases. At least in the Protein/protein-term case is probably does make sense to fix this. I shall ponder -- all suggestions welcome. The division between protein and protein-term is really rather articificial. As far as I can tell, the termination symbol is a bit like the gap symbol, in that it never occurs in "biologically real" sequences, but is a useful convenience for computation. Maybe we'll be able to build on that idea for BJ2 and get rid of the annoying distinction. Thomas. From mark.schreiber@agresearch.co.nz Mon Dec 9 00:08:44 2002 From: mark.schreiber@agresearch.co.nz (Schreiber, Mark) Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 13:08:44 +1300 Subject: [Biojava-dev] Suggestion for Canonical Symbols Message-ID: Would it be useful to use the Integer/ SubInteger model where protein alphabet is a sub alphabet of protein-term? > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Down [mailto:td2@sanger.ac.uk] > Sent: Monday, 9 December 2002 1:00 p.m. > To: Schreiber, Mark > Cc: biojava-dev@biojava.org > Subject: Re: [Biojava-dev] Suggestion for Canonical Symbols > > > On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 11:59:01AM +1300, Schreiber, Mark wrote: > > Hi - > > > > If you translate and RNA SymbolList into Protein the Symbols in the > > protein SymbolList come from the alphabet referenced by the > > ProteinTools.getTAlphabet. > > > > The Symbols from the Talphabet are not canonical with the > Symbols from > > the other protein Alphabet. This has lead to some very > surprising bugs > > in some stuff we were developing. Given that Integer > Symbols are now > > canonical even if they come from IntegerAlphabet or one of the > > Integer.SubAlphabets could the same happen for the protein > Alphabets? > > *sigh* > > That was actually the original behaviour. I broke it > (deliberately) a few weeks ago when fixing the knotty > question of serializing ambiguous symbols, so now you know > who to blame. At the time, requiring that all well-known > symbols should be scoped by Alphabet provided a sane way of > cleaning up the serialization code without having to write > totally new Symbol and Alphabet implementations for all the > well-known cases. At least in the Protein/protein-term case > is probably does make sense to fix this. I shall ponder -- > all suggestions welcome. > > The division between protein and protein-term is really > rather articificial. As far as I can tell, the termination > symbol is a bit like the gap symbol, in that it never occurs > in "biologically real" sequences, but is a useful convenience > for computation. Maybe we'll be able to build on that idea > for BJ2 and get rid of the annoying distinction. > > Thomas. > ======================================================================= Attention: The information contained in this message and/or attachments from AgResearch Limited is intended only for the persons or entities to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipients is prohibited by AgResearch Limited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately. ======================================================================= From td2@sanger.ac.uk Mon Dec 9 01:02:34 2002 From: td2@sanger.ac.uk (Thomas Down) Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 01:02:34 +0000 Subject: [Biojava-dev] Suggestion for Canonical Symbols In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20021209010234.GC162243@jabba.sanger.ac.uk> On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 01:08:44PM +1300, Schreiber, Mark wrote: > Would it be useful to use the Integer/ SubInteger model where protein > alphabet is a sub alphabet of protein-term? That's certainly a possibility. The problem comes with sorting out the SymbolTokenizations. Currently, the Protein-TERM tokenization has an "X" symbol which includes all possibly symbols _including TER_, which is different from the "X" in PROTEIN. Now, I don't know if this is important to anyone. In fact, personally I can't help wondering if it's wrong. On the other hand, thr translation of the coding "nnn" does include our hypothetical termination symbol. This doesn't prevent us going the sub-alphabet route, but it does mean we need to be careful to make sure everything ends up with the right tokenization. Thomas. From mark.schreiber@agresearch.co.nz Tue Dec 10 03:46:43 2002 From: mark.schreiber@agresearch.co.nz (Schreiber, Mark) Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 16:46:43 +1300 Subject: [Biojava-dev] Biojava in Anger Message-ID: Hi - I have setup some web pages that provide a cookbook, how to, kind of approach to performing basic tasks in biojava. It's available at http://bioconf.otago.ac.nz/biojava/ Comments, suggestions, flames and financial support all welcome. Enjoy Mark Schreiber PhD Bioinformatics AgResearch Invermay PO Box 50034 Mosgiel New Zealand PH: +64 3 489 9175 FAX: +64 3 489 3739 ======================================================================= Attention: The information contained in this message and/or attachments from AgResearch Limited is intended only for the persons or entities to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipients is prohibited by AgResearch Limited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately. ======================================================================= From MCCon012@mc.duke.edu Tue Dec 10 14:36:35 2002 From: MCCon012@mc.duke.edu (Patrick McConnell) Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 09:36:35 -0500 Subject: [Biojava-dev] Re: [Biojava-l] Biojava in Anger Message-ID: I think this is great! The more stuff like this that BioJava has, the better. These are the sorts of things that I think really help a software library become more usable. -Patrick "Schreiber, Mark" @biojava.org on 12/09/2002 10:46:43 PM Sent by: biojava-l-admin@biojava.org To: , cc: Subject: [Biojava-l] Biojava in Anger Hi - I have setup some web pages that provide a cookbook, how to, kind of approach to performing basic tasks in biojava. It's available at http://bioconf.otago.ac.nz/biojava/ Comments, suggestions, flames and financial support all welcome. Enjoy Mark Schreiber PhD Bioinformatics AgResearch Invermay PO Box 50034 Mosgiel New Zealand PH: +64 3 489 9175 FAX: +64 3 489 3739 ======================================================================= Attention: The information contained in this message and/or attachments from AgResearch Limited is intended only for the persons or entities to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipients is prohibited by AgResearch Limited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately. ======================================================================= _______________________________________________ Biojava-l mailing list - Biojava-l@biojava.org http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l From contests4us@lists.opt4email.com Wed Dec 11 13:18:31 2002 From: contests4us@lists.opt4email.com (Contests4Us Newsletter) Date: Dec 11 2002 13:18:31 Subject: [Biojava-dev] View photos of singles in your area! Message-ID: <200212120011.gBC0BuSQ003741@pw600a.bioperl.org> <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> Contests4.com Newsletter - View Photos & Bios! <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> Someone is searching for you. Find out who your match could be... Click Here to view photos and bios of singles in your area - for FREE! http://r1.opt4email.com/?u=140&l=11&id=1213371I AOL Users Click Here Thanks, Contests4Us.com http://www.contests4us.com You have received this email because you visited our partner or site and commenced registration to receive our newsletter. If you have received this email in error or would like to unsubscribe, please follow the instructions below. <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> * To be removed from this mailing list, click here: http://www.opt4email.com/u/?l=contests4us&e=biojava-dev@biojava.org AOL users click here to unsubscribe OR... * Reply to this email with the word "remove" as the subject. This message was sent to: biojava-dev@biojava.org X-Opt4email-Recipient: biojava-dev@biojava.org X-Opt4email-Userid: contests4us <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> From contests4us@lists.opt4email.com Thu Dec 12 10:16:56 2002 From: contests4us@lists.opt4email.com (Contests4Us Newsletter) Date: Dec 12 2002 10:16:56 Subject: [Biojava-dev] Join Now and Get 4 DVDs for 49˘ each! Message-ID: <200212122014.gBCKEGSQ013436@pw600a.bioperl.org> <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> FreeStuff4Us.com Newsletter - Get DVDs! <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> The Columbia House DVD Club is the best way to build your DVD collection. Check out today's best sellers like Training Day, Shrek, Gladiator and many more! Join now and you can... Get 4 DVDs for 49˘ each! shipping & processing only $1.99 per DVD Get a few new movies and a great price! Perfect for the holidays! http://r1.opt4email.com/?u=133&l=11&id=1213371 AOL Users Click Here Thanks, FreeStuff4Us.com http://www.freestuff4us.com You have received this email because you visited our partner or site and commenced registration to receive our newsletter. If you have received this email in error or would like to unsubscribe, please follow the instructions below. <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> * To be removed from this mailing list, click here: http://www.opt4email.com/u/?l=contests4us&e=biojava-dev@biojava.org AOL users click here to unsubscribe OR... * Reply to this email with the word "remove" as the subject. This message was sent to: biojava-dev@biojava.org X-Opt4email-Recipient: biojava-dev@biojava.org X-Opt4email-Userid: contests4us <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> From mark.schreiber@agresearch.co.nz Thu Dec 12 22:07:32 2002 From: mark.schreiber@agresearch.co.nz (Schreiber, Mark) Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 11:07:32 +1300 Subject: [Biojava-dev] Blast version support Message-ID: Hi - The setModeLazy() argument doesn't seem to allow the use of blastn files with unsupported version numbers. Is this method working? - Mark Mark Schreiber PhD Bioinformatics AgResearch Invermay PO Box 50034 Mosgiel New Zealand PH: +64 3 489 9175 FAX: +64 3 489 3739 ======================================================================= Attention: The information contained in this message and/or attachments from AgResearch Limited is intended only for the persons or entities to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipients is prohibited by AgResearch Limited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately. ======================================================================= From mark.schreiber@agresearch.co.nz Thu Dec 12 22:42:38 2002 From: mark.schreiber@agresearch.co.nz (Schreiber, Mark) Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 11:42:38 +1300 Subject: [Biojava-dev] Java 1.4 code in cvs Message-ID: Hi - The IndexedAnnotationDB class contains references to XMLEncoder and XMLDecoder. These are only in jdk 1.4. Is there a work around or do we need to bite the bullet and go to java 1.4 for biojava 1.3? - Mark Mark Schreiber PhD Bioinformatics AgResearch Invermay PO Box 50034 Mosgiel New Zealand PH: +64 3 489 9175 FAX: +64 3 489 3739 ======================================================================= Attention: The information contained in this message and/or attachments from AgResearch Limited is intended only for the persons or entities to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipients is prohibited by AgResearch Limited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately. ======================================================================= From matthew_pocock@yahoo.co.uk Fri Dec 13 00:09:34 2002 From: matthew_pocock@yahoo.co.uk (=?iso-8859-1?q?Matthew=20Pocock?=) Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 00:09:34 +0000 (GMT) Subject: [Biojava-dev] Java 1.4 code in cvs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20021213000934.42146.qmail@web14912.mail.yahoo.com> Sorry. My Bad. I'll move it to the src-1.4 dir. A lot of the parsing stuff I'm writing uses 1.4 features, and xml-serialization is much better than .ser files. Matthew --- "Schreiber, Mark" wrote: > Hi - > > The IndexedAnnotationDB class contains references to > XMLEncoder and > XMLDecoder. These are only in jdk 1.4. Is there a > work around or do we > need to bite the bullet and go to java 1.4 for > biojava 1.3? > > - Mark > > > Mark Schreiber PhD > Bioinformatics > AgResearch Invermay > PO Box 50034 > Mosgiel > New Zealand > > PH: +64 3 489 9175 > FAX: +64 3 489 3739 > > ======================================================================= > Attention: The information contained in this message > and/or attachments > from AgResearch Limited is intended only for the > persons or entities > to which it is addressed and may contain > confidential and/or privileged > material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination > or other use of, or > taking of any action in reliance upon, this > information by persons or > entities other than the intended recipients is > prohibited by AgResearch > Limited. If you have received this message in error, > please notify the > sender immediately. > ======================================================================= > > _______________________________________________ > biojava-dev mailing list > biojava-dev@biojava.org > http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-dev __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com From francois.pepin@mail.mcgill.ca Fri Dec 13 02:05:31 2002 From: francois.pepin@mail.mcgill.ca (Francois Pepin) Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 21:05:31 -0500 Subject: [Biojava-dev] FW: Suffix tree Message-ID: <000301c2a24c$1df25470$94a72581@hermes> Hi everyone, Is there anyone planning on doing a new version of the SuffixTree? Is there a reason I shouldn't go and do it myself? I've got a pretty good implementation of Ukkonen's suffix tree algorithm that I shouldn't need to modify all that much to fit the current methods, and it should make it a lot faster for the tree creation (O(n)). It's also got a lot more features than the current one (since I needed it to do some ). Or would it be better to just have it subclass it and override everything and then people can see what it's worth? François Pepin From matthew_pocock@yahoo.co.uk Fri Dec 13 10:10:24 2002 From: matthew_pocock@yahoo.co.uk (=?iso-8859-1?q?Matthew=20Pocock?=) Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 10:10:24 +0000 (GMT) Subject: [Biojava-dev] FW: Suffix tree In-Reply-To: <000301c2a24c$1df25470$94a72581@hermes> Message-ID: <20021213101025.75299.qmail@web14905.mail.yahoo.com> Hi François, The suffix tree impl is my fault. I wrote it as a quick-and-dirty way to do kernel methods (like support vector machines) over sequences. Since you have working code, the best plan is probably for you to add it to biojava as a seperate class, and then we can work out how to provide both implementations to people without twice the API. Have you replaced SuffixTree with your code, or is it a totaly seperate implementation? Anyway, send code and get added to the biojava 1.3 authors list. Matthew --- Francois Pepin wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Is there anyone planning on doing a new version of > the SuffixTree? Is > there a reason I shouldn't go and do it myself? > > I've got a pretty good implementation of Ukkonen's > suffix tree algorithm > that I shouldn't need to modify all that much to fit > the current > methods, and it should make it a lot faster for the > tree creation > (O(n)). It's also got a lot more features than the > current one (since I > needed it to do some ). > > Or would it be better to just have it subclass it > and override > everything and then people can see what it's worth? > > François Pepin > > > _______________________________________________ > biojava-dev mailing list > biojava-dev@biojava.org > http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-dev __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com From td2@sanger.ac.uk Sat Dec 14 20:06:18 2002 From: td2@sanger.ac.uk (Thomas Down) Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 20:06:18 +0000 Subject: [Biojava-dev] Suggestion for Canonical Symbols In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20021214200618.GA209830@jabba.sanger.ac.uk> On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 11:59:01AM +1300, Schreiber, Mark wrote: > Hi - > > If you translate and RNA SymbolList into Protein the Symbols in the > protein SymbolList come from the alphabet referenced by the > ProteinTools.getTAlphabet. Okay, I've fixed this one now -- we're back to the tried and tested system of allowing the well-known symbols to be global, rather than always scoped by alphabet. The code has been refactored a lot now, so I was able to find an alternative way round getting ambiguity symbol serialization to work. The tests still pass, and a few programs I've tried seem to be okay, but more testing in anger would be good. Thomas. From contests4us@lists.opt4email.com Sat Dec 14 12:27:04 2002 From: contests4us@lists.opt4email.com (Contests4Us Newsletter) Date: Dec 14 2002 12:27:04 Subject: [Biojava-dev] Instant Car Loan! Message-ID: <200212142201.gBEM1jSQ002965@pw600a.bioperl.org> <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> Contests4Us.com Newsletter - Get a New Car Loan! <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> Get an Instant Car loan and get into a new car! Click Here NOW: http://r1.opt4email.com/?u=143&l=11&id=1213371 AOL Users Click Here Thanks, Contests4Us.com http://www.Contests4Us.com You have received this email because you visited our partner or site and commenced registration to receive our newsletter. If you have received this email in error or would like to unsubscribe, please follow the instructions below. <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> * To be removed from this mailing list, click here: http://www.opt4email.com/u/?l=contests4us&e=biojava-dev@biojava.org AOL users click here to unsubscribe OR... * Reply to this email with the word "remove" as the subject. This message was sent to: biojava-dev@biojava.org X-Opt4email-Recipient: biojava-dev@biojava.org X-Opt4email-Userid: contests4us <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> From smh1008@cus.cam.ac.uk Mon Dec 16 10:30:24 2002 From: smh1008@cus.cam.ac.uk (David Huen) Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:30:24 +0000 Subject: [Biojava-dev] SAX use conventions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200212161030.25122.smh1008@cus.cam.ac.uk> While debugging a problem with the use of the blast XML parser with BlastLikeSearchBuilder, I have come against a problem that may be best solved by us deciding on and sticking to a convention when using SAX. When I wrote the blast XML parser, SAX was called with both the local and fully qualified names of elements/attributes in the parameter list. This is incompatible with the use of SAX within BlastLikeSearchBuilder where attributes are recovered by calling the version of the getAttribute method that expects a XML 1.0 qualified name with the local name. Nothing ever gets returned as a result. I can fix this in one of two ways:- i) change the blast xml parser to write out local names only to attributes OR ii) change ssbind to use the getAttributes call that expects the namespace URI and local name. If this is done, will it break anything else? Are there any views as to which solution is preferred? I would probably prefer (ii) but I'd rather canvass opinion to establish a convention we can stick to hereafter. Regards, David Huen From glorja_kovac@latinmail.com Mon Dec 16 13:20:50 2002 From: glorja_kovac@latinmail.com (glorja kovac) Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 08:20:50 -0500 Subject: [Biojava-dev] CAN YOU ASSIST ME? Message-ID: <20021216132046.2F1D93BE5E@smtp.latinmail.com> Hi My name is Glorja Kovac, daughter of late Miodrag Kovac, former Yugoslav Minister of Health. My father died under mysterious circumstances and immediately after his death the government seized our properties and froze our account. I was under house arrest for almost a year I was released after so much pressure from the British and u.s.a government. I discovered in my fathers memo that he deposited a large sum of money about US40.3 Million Dollars in a secured location outside my country (location will be given to you in due time). Because of the suspicious circumstances surrounding his death I can not contact any of my fathers friends to assist me in recovering this fund since I do no longer trust anybody. Presently, I have been able to get all the particulars that will enable me establish claim to this fund but I cannot do this alone without the assistance of an outsider who does not have any relationship with my country. It will be impossible for me to divulge all the need! ed information concerning these fu nds to you now until I am sure I can trust you adequately. I have contacted you hoping that I can trust and rely on you. Your assistance will be highly financially compensated and I am willing to negotiate with you whatever compensation you want. I will need your assistance in securing the release of these funds as it will be risky for me to present myself as the owner. If you are willing to assist me I will be most glad, however should you not be in a position to assist I will appreciate if you do not communicate the contents of this letter to any third party. Any action in this direction will be destructive to my person. Please you can reply me through this my private e-mail box: glorja_kovac@wowmail.com Yours submitfully, Glorja Kovac _________________________________________________________ http://www.latinmail.com. Gratuito, latino y en español. From contests4us@lists.opt4email.com Wed Dec 18 01:06:01 2002 From: contests4us@lists.opt4email.com (A Friend) Date: Dec 18 2002 01:06:01 Subject: [Biojava-dev] Someone wants to meet YOU! Message-ID: <200212180906.gBI96rSQ013547@pw600a.bioperl.org> <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> Contests4.com Newsletter - View Photos & Bios! <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> 7 million People, Pictures and Profiles at AmericanSingles.com - You never know who might be online and looking for love. Click here to Search and Join FREE! Click Here to view photos and bios of singles in your area - for FREE! http://r1.opt4email.com/?u=150&l=11&id=1213371 AOL Users Click Here Thanks, Contests4Us.com http://www.contests4us.com You have received this email because you visited our partner or site and commenced registration to receive our newsletter. If you have received this email in error or would like to unsubscribe, please follow the instructions below. <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> * To be removed from this mailing list, click here: http://www.opt4email.com/u/?l=contests4us&e=biojava-dev@biojava.org AOL users click here to unsubscribe OR... * Reply to this email with the word "remove" as the subject. This message was sent to: biojava-dev@biojava.org X-Opt4email-Recipient: biojava-dev@biojava.org X-Opt4email-Userid: contests4us <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> From staff@yoppit.com Fri Dec 20 18:29:15 2002 From: staff@yoppit.com (Nina) Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 13:29:15 -0500 (EST) Subject: [Biojava-dev] Buy a new car at 1% over invoice! Message-ID: <20021220182915.B1E803640A@mx.emailhowdy.com> Did you Know? You can buy America's top selling vehicles at 1% over invoice?* Click Here to Sign Up Now for FREE! http://redir.impulsive.com/redir.php?id=2817&u=475900655&b=5632 Look at the list to choose from: - Ford Explorer - Ford F-150 - Chevrolet Silverado - Ford Taurus - Honda Accord - Toyota Camry - Ford Focus - Jeep Cherokee - Chevrolet Cavalier - Nissan Altima - Dodge Ram - Honda Civic - Ford Ranger - Jeep Liberty - Chevrolet Tahoe To sign up now for FREE, click here. http://redir.impulsive.com/redir.php?id=2817&u=475900655&b=5632 *Only at StoneAge participating Dealers. Prices may vary depending on local market conditions or based on the configuration of the vehicle. StoneAge.com has been widely recognized as one of the nation's top automotive buying services since 1996. Headquartered in the "Motor City", StoneAge.com is improving the car buying experience for thousands of consumers each day. It currently serves 2,000,000 customers monthly, and maintains an extensive network of top-related car dealerships. Click here. http://redir.impulsive.com/redir.php?id=2817&u=475900655&b=5632 This Email Is Brought To You By EmailHello
We appreciate your patronage, and thank you for opting in To cancel your subscription to this newsletter, click here.
From brookecaine092@SendGreatOffers.com Sat Dec 28 06:00:05 2002 From: brookecaine092@SendGreatOffers.com (Brooke Caine) Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 00:00:05 -0600 Subject: [Biojava-dev] What are you doing New Year's Eve? Message-ID: <200212280739.gBS7dISQ014747@pw600a.bioperl.org> X-Info: 21587532 X-Info2: SGO Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" One2Onematch
Login Name
Password
Confirm Password
Email
Country
Zip Code
I am a Male Female
Seeking a Male Female
Dating Preference

I affirm that I am at least 18 years of age and that I agree to the One2Onematch Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
T
You are receiving this mailing because you are a member of SendGreatOffers.com and subscribed as:BIOJAVA-DEV@BIOJAVA.ORG To unsubscribe Click Here (http://admanmail.com/subscription.asp?em=BIOJAVA-DEV@BIOJAVA.ORG&l=SGO) or reply to this email with REMOVE in the subject line - you must also include the body of this message to be unsubscribed. Any correspondence about the products/services should be directed to the company in the ad. %EM%BIOJAVA-DEV@BIOJAVA.ORG%/EM%
From drusch@tcag.org Mon Dec 30 03:15:11 2002 From: drusch@tcag.org (Doug Rusch) Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2002 22:15:11 -0500 Subject: [Biojava-dev] paired feature problem Message-ID: <9A1D3672623FE64DA00A67D12BC679988BCB42@exchange2.vfirm.com> Is there a bug with the SimilarityPairBuilder in ssbind? I am trying to instantiate the paired features, this is going fine, except that the sibling is coming back as null. Now I have been looking at how the templates are used to create these features. There is no way for the templates to know what their sibling feaure will be given that the sib hasnt been created yet much less assigned to the template. What was the plan for this when the PairedFeature was first created? Happy Holidays everyone :) Doug Rusch TCAG.org From kdj@sanger.ac.uk Mon Dec 30 21:30:15 2002 From: kdj@sanger.ac.uk (Keith James) Date: 30 Dec 2002 21:30:15 +0000 Subject: [Biojava-dev] paired feature problem In-Reply-To: <9A1D3672623FE64DA00A67D12BC679988BCB42@exchange2.vfirm.com> References: <9A1D3672623FE64DA00A67D12BC679988BCB42@exchange2.vfirm.com> Message-ID: >>>>> "Doug" == Doug Rusch writes: Doug> Is there a bug with the SimilarityPairBuilder in ssbind? I Doug> am trying to instantiate the paired features, this is going Doug> fine, except that the sibling is coming back as null. Now I Doug> have been looking at how the templates are used to create Doug> these features. There is no way for the templates to know Doug> what their sibling feaure will be given that the sib hasnt Doug> been created yet much less assigned to the template. You're right in all respects. Serves me right for not following my own advice and including a test. I've added a setSibling method but retained the sibling field in the template (for use in creating new templates from an existing feature which has its sibling correctly set) and fixed a less obvious defect in the features (I hadn't overridden the superclass getTemplate). Updated the builder (will add test after vacation). There's a unit test for the feature too. Sorry for the inconvenience. Keith -- - Keith James bioinformatics programming support - - Pathogen Sequencing Unit, The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, UK - From perf-remove.4981.139095.12504924.0.0.1@b.list-email.net Tue Dec 31 02:01:59 2002 From: perf-remove.4981.139095.12504924.0.0.1@b.list-email.net (Content-Watch) Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 18:01:59 -0800 Subject: [Biojava-dev] Is there explicit content on your computer? Stop it Now Message-ID: <136979763-1463792126-1041300119@topica.com> You are receiving this email because you opted-in to receive special offers from Special Rewards through one of our marketing partners. If you feel you have received this email in error or do not wish to receive additional special offers, please reply to this email with the word "remove" in the subject line or follow the unsubscribe instructions below. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Is there pornography on your computer? Are you sure? FREE PC Check http://c.tfmb.net/maaaKlDaaU4Lpaa0Dgub/ Clean if off now! --------------------------------------------------------------------- You are currently subscribed as biojava-dev@biojava.org To unsubscribe from these mailings, please click here: http://optindeals.tfmb.net/?aaabsv.aa0Dgu.aaaKlD.aaaaab.aaaaaa.biojava-dev@biojava.org