[Biocorba-l] NS stuff

[Juha Muilu]

Brad Chapman wrote:
> 
---cut---
> 
> Do you mean a case like making EMBL available through both the EMBL
> IDL interface and a BioCorba interface? If so, could we do this
> more simply with:
> 
> database.BioCorba/EMBL.version
> database.embl/EMBL.version

Yes the database can have both or more interfaces. I was also thinking
that we could use the kind field for different versions of IDL.
Following naming scheme was on my mind:

databases/EMBL.version/BioCorba.version    &
databases/EMBL.version/EMBLCorbaServer.version

It is good to have possibility to put version numbers on proper places
and not to mix those into the id-part. ..I think the scheme contains the
minimum amount of information we need.

Any other comments?

> 
> This way BioCorba apps only use things with database.BioCorba, and
> thus we don't have to worry about having the same heirarchy between
> BioCorba and everything else in the world, so embl could keep its
> current heirarchy.
> 
> Any thoughts? Will something this simple work for BioCorba? Other
> opinions?
> 
> Brad
> --
> PGP public key available from http://pgp.mit.edu/
> _______________________________________________
> Biocorba-l mailing list
> Biocorba-l@biocorba.org
> http://www.biocorba.org/mailman/listinfo/biocorba-l

-- 
 +--------------------------------------------------------------------+
 |Juha Muilu, Ph.D., EMBL Outstation| Email:  muilu@ebi.ac.uk         |
 |European Bioinformatics Institute | Phone:  +44 (0)1223 494 624     |
 |Wellcome Trust Genome Campus      | Fax:    +44 (0)1223 494 468     |
 |Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SD, UK   | http://industry.ebi.ac.uk/~muilu|
 +--------------------------------------------------------------------+