transeq/fuzzpro on large sequences
thomas.laurent at uk.lionbioscience.com
Fri Mar 8 11:28:04 EST 2002
David Mathog wrote:
> That said, it might make even more sense in terms of performance, if not
> in terms of
> clean functional separation, if fuzzpro could translate for itself.
I'm far from being an EMBOSS expert, and I perheaps misunderstood this
part of your mail, but isn't Fuzztran doing that already ?
I mean instead of piping transeq to fuzzpro, fuzztran translate the dna
sequence then search for the pattern. It seems doing the same job.
But, I perheaps missed something.
More information about the EMBOSS