[Biopython] NJ tree constructor never completes

Peter Cock p.j.a.cock at googlemail.com
Mon Aug 14 15:31:45 UTC 2017


Hi Andrew,

My guess is you are simply seeing the quadratic scaling being a
problem. Can you try timing a series of subsets, say 10 entries, 50,
100, 200, 250, 500, 1000 - that approach ought to be enough to
estimate how long the full 6000 or so would take.

It may be you would be better off with a compiled command line
phylogenetic tree for work at this scale?

Peter

On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 4:21 PM, Andrew Sanchez <aas229 at nau.edu> wrote:
> I am trying to construct a tree from a DistanceMatrix object with len of 6303 with the following command:  `tree = constructor.nj(bio_dmx)`.
>
> The matrix and constructor were derived like so:
>
> bio_dmx = _DistanceMatrix(names, nested_dmx)
> constructor = DistanceTreeConstructor()
>
> I've tested my workflow on a much smaller distance matrix, just following the examples at http://biopython.org/wiki/Phylo and it worked just fine.  When I try to do it with this larger dataset, the process just hangs.  I don't know where to begin debugging.  First of all, how long should I expect this process to take?  From wikipedia:  “...typical run times proportional to approximately the square of the number of taxa."
>
> Maybe it is normal for a tree of this size to take so long to construct?  If so, is there a way to run tree = constructor.nj(bio_dmx) so that it produces some output that will allow me to at least see that something is happening?
>
> I was trying to do this in an IPython session, and eventually I just cancelled the process which had been going for about 48 hours.  The result of the keyboard interrupt was:
>
> /home/aas229/anaconda3/envs/gbfilter/lib/python3.4/site-packages/Bio/Phylo/TreeConstruction.py in nj(self, distance_matrix)
>    697                 node_dist[i] = 0
>    698                 for j in range(0, len(dm)):
> --> 699                     node_dist[i] += dm[i, j]
>    700                 node_dist[i] = node_dist[i] / (len(dm) - 2)
>    701
>
> /home/aas229/anaconda3/envs/gbfilter/lib/python3.4/site-packages/Bio/Phylo/TreeConstruction.py in __getitem__(self, item)
>    166                 raise TypeError("Invalid index type.")
>    167             # check index
> --> 168             if row_index > len(self) - 1 or col_index > len(self) - 1:
>    169                 raise IndexError("Index out of range.")
>    170             if row_index > col_index:
>
> /home/aas229/anaconda3/envs/gbfilter/lib/python3.4/site-packages/Bio/Phylo/TreeConstruction.py in __len__(self)
>    284     def __len__(self):
>    285         """Matrix length"""
> --> 286         return len(self.names)
>    287
>    288     def __repr__(self):
>
> Does this output suggest that the job was in fact running just fine, but just taking a really long time?
>
> Is there any other info that would be helpful in figuring this out?
>
> Thank you,
> Andrew
> _______________________________________________
> Biopython mailing list  -  Biopython at mailman.open-bio.org
> http://mailman.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biopython



More information about the Biopython mailing list