[Bioperl-pipeline] Annotation+Transformers
Juguang Xiao
juguang at fugu-sg.org
Thu Mar 20 10:18:30 EST 2003
>>
>> I also had such problem, Shawn, do you remember that I added
>> get_all_Contig_name in RawContigAdaptor in my local code, and never
>> submit into ensembl because i am not sure if they like this
>> no-harm-but-not-necessary-for-them sub. I prefer to have 2 own
>> module, rather than changing the ensembl code.
>>
>
> You mean creating another supplementary module?
> Isn't neater to just add the subroutine to ensembl?
> Its something that ensembl used to have anyway....
That is also policy question I am keen to get answered, that if it is
acceptable by ensembl guys to have extra committed methods which is
other project specific, so far.
Personally, I also do not like the way to create such 2 modules, I
prefer to add get_all_Contig_name in
Bio::EnsEMBL::DBSQL::RawContigAdaptor.
Juguang
More information about the bioperl-pipeline
mailing list