[Bioperl-l] fwding question blast vs blast+

Smithies, Russell Russell.Smithies at agresearch.co.nz
Fri Jul 15 04:07:42 UTC 2011


Works fine for me parsing blast+ 2.2.24 and bioperl 1.61.
Have you done a diff on the output from the 2 versions of blast+ to see what's changed?
I suspect NCBI has changed the output slightly and broken our parser.

--Russell

> -----Original Message-----
> From: bioperl-l-bounces at lists.open-bio.org [mailto:bioperl-l-
> bounces at lists.open-bio.org] On Behalf Of Albert Vilella
> Sent: Friday, 15 July 2011 1:03 p.m.
> To: bioperl-l
> Subject: [Bioperl-l] fwding question blast vs blast+
> 
> http://biostar.stackexchange.com/questions/10295/bioperl-has-different-
> behaviours-in-parsing-blast-and-blast-result
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
=======================================================================
Attention: The information contained in this message and/or attachments
from AgResearch Limited is intended only for the persons or entities
to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipients is prohibited by AgResearch
Limited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the
sender immediately.
=======================================================================




More information about the Bioperl-l mailing list