[Bioperl-l] version() vs seq_version()
cjfields at illinois.edu
Fri Jun 25 16:31:04 EDT 2010
Looking at bug 3095:
As indicated there seems to be some redundancy between Bio::Seq::version() and Bio::Seq::RichSeq::seq_version(). Several formats (asciitree, genbank, embl, bsml, etc) all call seq_version(), whereas others use version() if at all. My guess is the SV line from EMBL, but shouldn't using version() handle this?
Just as an experiment, I actually got seq_version to delegate to version() and all tests passed, so maybe this should just delegate or alias?
More information about the Bioperl-l