[Bioperl-l] bioperl-dev or branch?

[Hilmar Lapp]

I'm not sure the discussion ever ended in a real decision re: Chase  
Miller's Summer of Code project.

My understanding of the consensus is that it being new and  
experimental code it should first come to life on bioperl-dev, main  
trunk. Existing modules that need to be altered should either be  
altered on bioperl-live main trunk or, if the modifications are  
expected to be too disruptive, on a branch of bioperl-live that is  
expressly created for this purpose (i.e., will be folded back into  
main trunk before the conclusion of the summer).

Does that match what everyone else thought?

	-hilmar
-- 
===========================================================
: Hilmar Lapp  -:-  Durham, NC  -:-  hlapp at gmx dot net :
===========================================================