[Bioperl-l] RC3 candidates

[Hilmar Lapp]

Yes - let me know what you want me to do. It's stable and passes all 
tests against the bioperl main trunk, at least last time I checked. The 
only parts not supported yet are feature graphs and round-tripping 
fuzzy locations (they become simple locs).

	-hilmar

On Sep 30, 2005, at 5:44 AM, Jason Stajich wrote:

> We can call it 0.9 if it is not quite ready to be the release for the 
> paper.   I guess I mean do you want it to go out at the same time as 
> we make this dev release regardless of what we call it.
>
> -j
> On Sep 30, 2005, at 1:49 AM, Hilmar Lapp wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sep 29, 2005, at 6:36 AM, Jason Stajich wrote:
>>
>>
>>> (BTW Hilmar are you interested in bioperl-db being also tagged as 
>>> 1.5.X and released?)
>>>
>>
>> Not sure (tag) and yes (release). I.e., the question is whether 
>> bioperl-db releases should be numbered the same as Bioperl, or 
>> receive its own release numbering.
>>
>> (The BioSQL release is also imminent to semi-coincide w/ the paper, 
>> but will be called 1.0.)
>>
>>     -hilmar
>> -- 
>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>> Hilmar Lapp                            email: lapp at gnf.org
>> GNF, San Diego, Ca. 92121              phone: +1-858-812-1757
>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Jason Stajich
> Duke University
> http://www.duke.edu/~jes12
>
>
>
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------
Hilmar Lapp                            email: lapp at gnf.org
GNF, San Diego, Ca. 92121              phone: +1-858-812-1757
-------------------------------------------------------------